When Math is Simple but not Easy

According to the Center for Disease Control and Prevention, in 2013, more than 60% of adults aged 18 and older in the United States were either obese or overweight. That same year, Americans spent more than $60 billion annually trying to lose weight.[1] Strange diet and exercise ads litter the internet and television, promising a “magic bullet”, allowing one to lose weight with only three easy payments of $29.95 plus shipping and handling.

At the end of the day, weight loss is a simple math problem. If the following inequality holds, one will lose weight:

Calories In < Calories Out

 

My selection of the adjective simple is deliberate. I overheard someone at training camp snidely commenting on a statement from one of the nutrition lectures (from Lori Nedescu). “She said it was easy. It is not.” This snarl comes from the misuse of adjectives – simple and easy are not the same. The nutritionist referred to the math equation and the athlete to the difficulty adhering

Chuck in March of 2015 to the constraints of that equation. The math is simple. Implementing the equation is not easy.

 

 

In March 2015, my husband weighed 212 pounds at training camp. As a cyclist concerned about watts per kilogram and married to another cyclist who likes to do hilly road races, he announced his intention to reach 175 pounds by September when he toes the line at U.S. Masters Nationals. He has made similar statements in the almost four years we have been together. He achieved short-lived success by implementing some draconian diet plan, but the results did not stick.

 

This time it is different. Why?

 

Math.

 

For the first time, he tuned out the “bright shiny thing” diet books or plans and focused on both sides of the equation, both of which required a great deal of lifestyle change.

 

Calories – out: With his military job and time spent on Kylecoaching and cycling team responsibilities, training was at the bottom of the list in terms of importance. In his desire to make USMES a success, his training (and mine) suffered greatly. However, he knew this needed to change. In my opinion, his calorie-out success comes from three items:

 

1. Accountability: He hired Damian Ruse (SPC Coaching) as his coach and uploaded his files daily.

 

2. Priority: When we would arrive home after work, we immediately hopped on the bike before he would check email or social media.

 

3. Variety: He hates the gym. I stated my desire to return to my weight-lifting regime and he said he would go with me. I have heard that before. This time he actually goes…complaining….but he is there with me.

 

Calories – in: The food side of the house is always the hardest. Chuck’s calorie-in achievements come from these three concepts or actions:

 

1. Signaling: A friend of mine who is a personal trainer who I greatly respect once commented to me that his clients who struggled to lose weight needed to learn to be hungry. We eat for some many reasons beyond fueling our bodies for the rigors of life. Chuck learned to be hungry…that his desire for food X wasn’t because his body needed it but because he wanted it. He learned to say no.

 

2. Data: Using a diet tracking app on his phone (myfitnesspal), he logged everything that he ate before he ate it. Since this app is on-line, his food entries are there for all to see.

 

3. Exclusion: Chuck, as many do, loves comfort foods and food variety and we all have many food buttons from our experiences in childhood and beyond. In order to maintain race weight and health, certain restaurants are no longer frequented by our household. Period. No more 5 Guys, la Madeleine, and other places I would rather not admit I have frequented.

Chuck and friend Jeffrey on May 31st 2015

 

Above all, Chuck benefited from the advice of a subject matter expert on nutrition, Dr. James Weinstein. In the beginning, Chuck went a little crazy with the calorie counting. (and little is used loosely – completely might be better). Jim guided him from “Eating under 1000 calories/day is my goal” strategy to one which is sustainable for both the athlete and those who love him.

 

As of the beginning of June, Chuck weighs 186 pounds and his race results show great improvement AND the completion of the mother of all hilly road races….Tour of Tucker County. He is healthier and no longer eats my chocolate. We no longer disagree about riding after work or on the weekend when not racing. Now if I can only convince him that getting a dog somehow is part of this process…..#lovehomerweinstein.

 

[1]Geoff Williams, “The Heavy Price of Losing Weight”, http://money.usnews.com/money/personal-finance/articles/2013/01/02/the-heavy-price-of-losing-weight.

 

Race Report: McDonald’s Tristate Criterium – Chuck Kyle

Race Report

McDonald’s Tristate Criterium – Huntington, WV

Category 3-4 Criterium
Category Masters 40+ Criterium

May 30, 2015
Late Afternoon races

FinishTo emphasize this race, I have to start with shutting off the alarm at 4:30 AM, getting up at 6:39 AM and Dana saying, “Let’s go!!” After a 407 mile drive, we ended up in my hometown of Huntington WV.

As I drove from DC to Huntington, the day was looking better and better. My daughters, Brynne and Shannyn, both texted to find out when I raced. By the time we arrived in Huntington, I was in a great mood and ready to take on two back-to-back races.

When the course opened to pre-ride, the anxiety of the other riders in the 3/4 race was evident, as most of the field lined up far before the official call-up. At the beginning of the race, Ben Kuhlman (Pro Mountain Outfitters ) toed the line beside me, and we talked about last weekend’s Tour of Tucker County. Ben mentioned he heard this crit was fast. Little did I know that this statement was foreshadowing of his race plan. When the official said go, Ben was off. So I, at least, got a good warm-up chasing him the first half lap.

The afternoon was sunny, hot, and windy. As the whistle blew to start the race, it was close to 100 degrees. The course is flat and non-technical, a rectangle with left-hand turns. On the back stretch there was a pretty good tail wind and then the final stretch a good head wind. Luckily, the town of Huntington had repaired any damage from a cold and snowy winter, and the roads were virtually pothole free.

From a picture of the start/finish line, you would think the McDonald’s TriState Criterium is part of the NRC. The crowd is great, the competition is real, the purse is outstanding, but the fields are small. If they could only get more teams to come into town, this would be a great venue, but a 7-hour drive for a crit is a bit much for MABRA and VACA based folks. A Saturday Crit and Sunday TT might be a way to make this a two-day event and make that long drive more palatable.

My goal for the CAT 3-4 race was to get a good warm-up for the Master’s race and not to be dead last. I figured that by setting the bar that low, I would not be disappointed. I sat in for the race, didn’t burn too many matches, and waited for the final sprint. The last lap, I was happy to be poster fodder, ended up in the bottom half of the field during the sprint finish.

The Master 40+ race was a little different. I wanted to improve upon my finish at the Tour of Somerville. I have been pleased with my last few races and wanted to give my daughters and my dad a good race result. I started off with the three basic rules for crit racing:
1.) Line up on the front line.
2.) Stay in the top quarter of the race.
3.) Execute a plan. The plan was with 2-3 to go, go off of the front.

One of the neat things about this race, teams show up and execute a plan. Texas Roadhouse was one such team. Over the first three or four laps, they attacked until one was successful. Three TRH riders and two from other teams would manage to stay away for the race. I was in the position to cover each of the breaks, but I did not think something would stick in the first half of the race. With that said, for the next 15 or so laps, TRH pack riders moved to the front and slowed the field. I was not in the position to either attempt a bridge or drag the field back, so it was evident that the field would be sprinting for fourth place (one of the break-away riders had floated back to the field). With seven to go, I was on one of the TRH wheels (Lance Fagerburg) and another TRH rider came up and told him he had the field sprint (they had already locked in 1-2-3 now they were just adding more money to the split). Now my strategy changed. Stay on Lance’s wheel and I did. The next two laps were all about high-speed survival and squeezing through holes I can’t believe I could make. Came down to the sprint finish and I rolled across the line 3rd in the field print, 7th overall.

Lesson Learned?? Race like I am on Lance’s wheel. Just not something that I have done in the past.

Race Report: French Fries and the Rolling Thunder….. – Dana Stryk

Race Report

The French Fry Crit (McDonald’s TriState Criterium), Saturday, May 29th, Huntington, WV:
Jenette William and Dana
after the race
Chuck’s hometown puts on a race every year.  The promoter, Jeff’s Bike Shop, does an excellent job and must have some incredible sponsors.  The course is a flat, 4 left turn rectangle with open corners and decent pavement. I have raced the past two year, finishing 5th and 8th.  In the past, I have tried to create break since the field has one woman in particular who is an amazing sprinter (by the name of Jenette Williams – who races in our area from time to time).  This year, with still-rebuilding-from-traveling-to-Mongolia status, my goal was to sit on her wheel, let her pull me to the line and then pray for divine intervention.  Jenette has a nice steady wheel ath – short of my goal of a podium but happy with most of my race.  I made enough to cover race fees and pay for dinner.  I only wish they would offer French Fry premes…..

nd I stuck to her like glue until she drifted to the back of the pack where, given the crashes in previous years, I did not want to be.  There were attacks but nothing stuck.  With 2 to go, I made mental notes as to where I needed to be on the final two turns.  Into the second to the last turn, I lost Jenette’s wheel but had a clear shot to the line.  I ended up 6

Millers School Age-Graded RR:
The 35+ and 45+ Masters women raced together.  As our start time neared, the skies darkened and thunder could be heard.  Chuck, my soigneur (what else should the newly retired do??), changed
VACA State Podium

wheels for me.  Two years ago, Mother Nature’s wrath was sent upon us and I promised that I would not race anything other than aluminum wheels when I could hear thunder.  Of course, switching from 303s to 101s ensured we were dry, a sacrifice about which I am joking but will take credit for the dry conditions.  Our race was shortened to 2 laps – I believe all the races in the afternoon were shortened. Normally, the shortened length would anger me since I fare better when the course is harder. However…this year I was happy that it was shorter.

I think the group stayed together until the first time past the finish line and slowly our numbers dwindled.  This year our races have become interesting in terms of who is willing to work and who sits in.  I was worried about having enough fitness to do work at the front, so I was among those hiding.  Sue and Amanda (ABRT) attacked the field multiple times as did Jenette (from the aforementioned French Fry crit), but everything was chased down.  By the time we hit the final stretch, we were a total of about 12 – with 4 (including me) in the 45+ category.  I knew where the attack would happen and it did – at that point, I honestly could not suffer anymore and watched the group ride away from me.  Janelle (Colavita), who won the 45+ race, was behind me at the time and I just let her go.  I can give a litany of excuses….off the bike due to family obligations last week, lots of stress from travel and other things….but at the moment when I needed to gut it out just a couple more meters, I could not.  Janelle and Patti (both Colavita) had a great race and congrats to them for the top two steps on the podium.  I ended up 4th for MABRA and 2nd for the VACA 45-49 age group.
Next up:
We will head down south for the Chesapeake Criterium (which is the VA State Championship) and the PLT TT, to get a little TT practice before ToWC.
Dana