Race Report – Ontario Providential Track Championships – Dana Stryk

Ontario Providential Track Championships

Milton, Ontario, Canada

March 6 – 9, 2020

 

For those reading this race report without any great knowledge of track racing, some background:  Track racers subdivide into two “types” – enduros (mass start races, individual pursuits) and meatheads/sprinters (match sprint, time trials).  For most people, doing both well is difficult, since the type of training required to excel at one does not translate into the other. (Think crit racer versus hilly road racer.)  Track races subdivide into mass start races, timed events, match sprints, and team events.  For most races, the mass start events consist of a scratch race where first across the line wins and a points race, with points awarded every so many laps for the first few across the line, double points at the end of a race (and points for lapping the field).  For most track events, the mass start races combine into an omnium, with the winner the one with the most (or least, depending on scoring method) points after all mass-start races.

Racing began on Friday, with the 2K Individual pursuit. This event is the one for which I trained last year and came to the conclusion that the word “subtlety” does not describe my ability to dial-up or down my effort level and while I could do “ok” in these events locally, at the national and world stage, I do not think I have the mentality of a pursuiter.  Hello, sprint.

I arrived in Ontario via plane while Chuck drove Oliver, our RV, across the border and to the velodrome.  The gracious race organizers allowed us to reserve pit space in the infield and two American track friends, Ted Michaels and Darrell Farlow, joined us.  Ted raced the Masters’ Omnium and Darrell the Masters’ TT and match sprints.  Chuck, being Chuck, did all three.  I registered for the TT (500m) and the omnium (4 races total).

Masters’ Women Time Trial – 500 meters – 2 laps.

My PR is a few seconds over 43, which is not a great time. I was excited to see what time I could produce, given that my training changed to focus on this event.  My heat was the last one for the field, and the fastest time was 2 seconds slower than my best.  A clean race should put me on the top step.

Sadly, that was not the case.  When my bike was loaded into the starting gate and I climbed aboard, I was canted and leaning up track.  I am not a strong enough starter to compensate for the angle.  I dismounted and said the bike set up was not right and asked for a reset.  The volunteer complied and reset.  It was still angled.  The official said to get on the bike, so I did.  Countdown – 5-4-3-2-1-beep.  I exploded as best I could.  My bike went up-track and I unclipped on the first rotation of my right foot.  I rolled off the track, dejected and a bit miffed.

As I soft-pedaled on the apron, the officials on the other side of the track told me I would have a re-do.  Immediately and on this side of the track.  I put my pedals where I like them to start and tried to calm myself.  Gun goes off and the same thing happened.  However, I had to keep going, so I pedaled with my right foot not clipped in.

That is racing.  I tried to get out of my own head and make the best of the 40 something seconds on the track. I had the slowest first lap and the second-fastest second lap.  Although, if you think about it, I did have the fastest time for someone using one leg (at least for my race).  I really wanted to see what dividends my winter training would pay, but that will have to wait.

Meanwhile – Chuck has his TT.  Typically men of his age have a 500 m TT. This one was 750 m.  It doesn’t sound like much longer but….. Chuck’s first lap was one of the slower ones in his field but he crushed the 2nd and destroyed the 3rd lap to finish 4th, one step off the podium.  Darrell also crushed his TT (different age groups), landing on the top step of the podium.

Until Sunday, the number of mass start track races in my race history equaled one.  I increased that number by 400%, with four races: 5K Scratch, 5K Tempo, 5K Elimination, 40 lap points.  From years of crit racing, I know how to race a scratch and points race, although on a flat surface and with a bike having brakes and more than one gear.  In track racing, you cannot queue up at the start line – the surface is banked and clipping on a fixed gear bike would be a bit dangerous.  Rather, you hold onto the railing at the top of the track or onto a holder on the apron.  You roll out from the backside of the track in your pre-determined order and slow pedal to your starting position.  For me, this meant I had to roll up to the railing and catch the railing while ensuring I was lined up with the person down-track and my pedals weren’t at some weird position.  For my whopping one race experience – where I walked my bike up to the top of the track – this alone made Elsa, my chimp, a bit nuts (see the Brave Athlete book to understand Elsa).

Omnium:

While I wanted redemption and had this been a road crit, I would have been more comfortable trying to take out my frustration from the TT, I am also a chicken.  I have avoided mass-start track races like Covid-19.  During the break between the TT and the start of the omnium, I wanted to stay in Oliver, snuggle my emotional support stuffed animals, and quit.  I am not a participation medal person.  While I often chicken out in executing a race strategy, I don’t go into a race thinking simply finishing is the goal (except for Clarendon and Crystal City races in the Air Force Classic – finishing is good enough…).  So race experience was my goal.  So wimpy!

Scratch race:  5km which is 20 laps.  First across the line wins.  I was 5th.  I felt comfortable moving around the track.  The pace seemed good-to-fast.  A couple of accelerations opened up a gap every so often, but people were willing to work together and chase them down.  Coming into the turn before the bell, a gap opened that I could not close down, so I was not in the mix for the final sprint.  Given my nerves, Elsa was ok with that.

Tempo race:  5km – points every other lap for the first across the line.  Bell would ring to denote the start of the point lap.  Apparently, one woman thought points started after the neutral lap.  We roll through the finish line for the first lap of racing and she takes off.  I put my head down and hopped on the train in the sprinters’ lane, thinking….well, this is what I will be doing for the next 20 laps.  Three laps down and the bell rings for the first point, sprint.  Regroup.  Pace slows. At this point, I was suffering.  I knew I should be further up in the group and tried moving up but backed off a bit during the sprint for each point lap.  Not yet comfortable standing out of the saddle surrounded by others.  5th again.  Turns out that rabbit for the first few laps though the points started after the neutral lap.

Lunch break – thank goodness.  I had spent less than 45 minutes racing but I wanted to call it two and done.  Darrell made a Starbucks run. I have to say that was the best almond milk latte ever. With some food and caffeine and the promise to my legs that we had only one more race, we rolled up to the rail.

Elimination – 5 km, once the racing begins, the last one to cross the line (measured by the back of the bike) on the elimination lap is pulled out of the race.  Situational awareness is key. I miscounted.  I thought we had N+1 when we had N.  Oops. Eliminated.  Again 5th.

Points Race – 40 laps, points 4 deep at 30, 20, 10, 1 to go.  Double points for the last sprint.  I managed to grab a couple of points in the race.  The person sitting in 6th attacks and gets away.  No one chases her, so I move into the sprinter’s lane, put my head down to pull the field back to her.  I look back.  No one behind me.  Crap.  I look at the lap counter.  6 to go.  Double crap.  “Do I continue to chase?  Wait…she is one place below me.  If she stays away, would I drop to 6th?”  I checked the leaderboard out of the corner of my eye and realized 5th was mine.  Should I keep going?  I did.  The leaders in the omnium caught me in turn 3 on the last lap.  I had nothing left to use to stay with them.  Upon reflection, I should have attacked and tried to lap the field.  I was far enough down in the points that I was not a threat to the top three, so they may not have given chase.

Other races:

Darrell kicked some butt in the match sprints, coming in 3rd and 1st in the TT.  Chuck raced extremely well.  Ended up 9th in the omnium, 4th in the TT.  For Ted – he does what Ted tends to do in a points race…take lots of points early, finishing in the top 10 as well in the omnium.

Lessons learned:  I have a lot to learn about mass starts and the strategies for success.  Change pedals or get some straps.

Things to do moving forward:  Race more.  On the track.  Earn some color on the sleeves of a Brihop jersey.

A huge thank you to the Masters’ Women in Ontario.  They welcomed me into the fold, encouraging me and making me feel like a local.  The organization of the event and the quality of the officiating (starting gate comment aside) were top notch.

Riding uphill into the wind while watching Netflix

Uphill Stationary Bike
Uphill Stationary Bike
Dana’s pain station in our Bike Torture Chamber (BTC)

Given where I live, my job, and my training schedule, attempting to execute workouts during the week by riding outside is a challenge.  Years ago, I purchased a CompuTrainer and discovered the joys of a smart trainer.

While CompuTrainer was the leader in the smart trainer market, they failed to recognize the economic potential of such a product. Enter Wahoo. We soon replaced our CTs with Kickrs (our review on the CT vs. KICKR).  Life was good.

Wahoo soon entered the bike computer market with the Elemnt (apparently someone at Wahoo does not like vowels!).  Hubby bought me one and I begrudgingly tried it.  Loved it.  Ditto for the bike mat.  Moral of this story thus far:  Hubby loves to try all the accessories.  I do not.  (bike mat for $50+?  $10 yoga mat is fine)

Wahoo recently added two more accessories (which include all the appropriate vowel):  the Headwind and the Climb to the smart trainer family.  I received both for my birthday.  Priced at $249.99 and $599.99, these accessories are not cheap.  Are they worth it?  When Hubby told me about these items, I was more interested in the Climb, since I enjoy mountainous terrain.  I thought the Headwind would be a gimmicky rip-off.

The Climb:  The Climb replaces your front wheel.  Using Bluetooth, the climb will pair with your smart trainer and allowing Zwift to adjust the front end of the bike as you climb and descend the volcano on Watopia.  One can manually set the level as well and there is a return to zero gradient option.  Is it fun?  Yes.  Does it simulate climbing?  As much as is probably possible, given the garage is in Virginia and the Alps are in France.  It is better than stacking books or multiple riser blocs.  Is it worth $600?  Depends on your budget constraint.  (One aside – as a former bike fitter, I would love to use the Climb for bike fits – very easy to level the bike.  One could also put a rider closer to the position one is in while climbing – for those riders who have pain while climbing, this would provide some insight.)

Wahoo Climb and HEadwind
Dana’s setup with the Wahoo Climb and Headwind

The Headwind:  To be honest, I thought a fan that costs $250 was just plain stupid.  I could care less that it adjusts the speed of the fan based on my effort on the bike paired to the smart trainer.  Then I got on the bike and turned it on the highest setting.  It was 90+ degrees outside and very humid.  Normally, riding inside is virtually impossible on the hot and humid days in July and August.  OMG. That fan is awesome!  It sits on the floor and the angle is perfect – hits you in the face and upper body.  I have asthma and if I feel overheated while pedaling inside, breathing is problematic.  After the first ride, I thought – awesome fan but $250?  Too high.

After a week of riding inside doing some nasty intervals that left me hanging over the handlebars, wanting to vomit on the Climb, I fell in love with the Headwind.  All $249.99 + tax worth of it.  I think one of the greatest challenges for most people riding on a smart trainer, outside of boredom, is sweating/heat.  The Headwind solves that issue.

My final thoughts – The Climb makes Zwift more fun.  The Headwind makes you better able to stay on the bike and complete the workout on the smart trainer.  Which of the two makes you faster up Col du Galibier?  As always, no shortcuts, only hard work.  For me, I would buy the Headwind since it helps me train harder.  The Climb is fun but expensive.

 

Dana

 

Race Report: 2017 USA Cycling Masters Road National Championships – Dana Stryk

Dana Podium

Masters Road National Championship Race Report

Augusta’s River Region, GA

June 1-4, 2017

 

When USA Cycling moved Masters Nats from Winston-Salem, NC to Augusta, GA, I thought only about the additional hours needed to drive to the race and not about the topography change.  Lesson learned.

 

Thursday, June 1st:  Time Trial

Strom Thurmond Dam, 29 km of rolling hills and little wind.

Field:  W50-54, Field size: 13.

Not even the most talented and witty writer could make a TT race report interesting.  I hit my wattage numbers.

Evo Results:

7th – Dana (50-54)

8th – Christine (50-54)

8th – Laura (45-49)

 

Friday, June 2nd:  Road Race

Fort Gordon, 15 miles and 1023 ft. climbing per lap, 4 laps.

Field:  W50-54, Field size: 18.

 

The course was hilly, nothing too steep or too long, just lots of hills.  At mile marker 14, the road slopes upward for the next half mile, with gradients from “Oh, is this a hill?” to 7%.  As the road flattens and bends to the right, you see the finish line.   I imagined that hill would be nicknamed “Heartbreak Hill” by many.

 

Christine and I raced at 3:35pm, with Laura’s field starting five minutes before us.  As I soft-pedaled waiting for the call to the line, the officials offered the option to shorten the race because of the heat.  With temps in the mid-90s, sunny skies and a course with minimal shade, reducing the length sounded good – but I wondered what that would do to the intensity of the race.  Dehydration was a serious concern.  Chuck and Dave would be in the feed zone at Mile 14 and neutral water supplied at Mile 10.  Eating and hydrating during a race are things at which I do not excel.  I often seem to channel my inner camel and survive a race on what I already have in my bottle cages.

 

In our field was the defending champion, Kim Pettit as well as the woman who won the TT (Jan) and some others from hillier parts of the country.  I watched to see who seemed to climb well out of the gate and tried to sit on Kim’s wheel.  Chuck’s advice about the RR stayed in my mind – you have to stay with the pack up and over every climb since the nature of the terrain will not allow you to catch the group on the downhill without expending a ton of energy.  Those downhills were deceptive – they looked long enough to catch back on but….if you could, you were burning matches while the pack was coasting.

 

At the top of each hill, the front of the pack accelerated.  Since I did not have power displayed, I had no idea if my RPE (my RPE = “The Devil went down to Georgia, is wearing lycra, and is in my race.”) equaled my power output, which was a good thing.  I was either coasting or out of the saddle. It was hot.  I was miserable.

 

We were up the finishing hill and through the feed zone.  Taking a bottle from Chuck, I wondered if my face showed my pain (answer:  yes).  Through the start/finish, 30 more miles to go.

 

As we made the first turn, someone cornered poorly, allowing a gap in the field and I sprinted to close it.  Legs said, “ouch – pay attention – you don’t have a ton of those matches to waste”.  Same thing happened on the second long climb in the lap. I realized that I was climbing the same pace as those around me but a gap had opened.  Another couple matches used.

 

We caught two women from the field in front of us and I heard Laura’s voice giving me encouragement as we passed.  How she could even talk, I am not sure.  The miles slowly passed.

 

Our race did not have any attacks, just some accelerations at the top of each hill that was slowly wearing me down.  Around mile 25, I popped off, caught back on and then was done.  Fortunately, I was not alone.  Bessie (who was 3rd in the TT) and I worked together to see if we could catch anyone else who popped.  We caught and passed someone and then slowed too much as someone (Gina) behind us pulled the already passed girl back to us.   Earlier, Bessie and I made plans to go to the line without sprinting since we were out of the top 5.  We all know how silly that looks!  While I had no idea where we were in the field, I really didn’t want to soft pedal and drop three places so……I decided to sprint.  Silly, I know but I wanted to finish in the top 10 in each of my races (given the field size….well….not so hard).  I also figured…when do I get a chance to practice sprinting through the start/finish line at a national championship?

 

We climb up Heartbreak Hill, turn the corner and I am on Gina’s wheel.  With about 150 meters to go, I pulled out and set my sights on the line.  Bessie gave chase and nipped me at the line.  Wonderful sprinting for 9th and 10th.

 

Evo Results:

50-54

10th:  Dana

16th:  Christine

45-49

Lesson learned:  be careful what you do with your hands when you ride through the start/finish!  The officials pulled Laura.  One of them thought she signaled she was quitting and DNF’d her.  Laura handled it with a great deal of grace.

 

Sunday, June 4th:  Criterium

Downtown Augusta, 45 minutes

Field:  W50-54, Field size: 11.  Combined with the W45-49 for total size = 20.

 

Last year, the crit course, located in the parking lot of an expo center, contained some technical corners in the first part of the course.  Nerves and fear rather than tactics made me jump at the gun, which positioned me in a break from the start and I ended up on the podium in 5th place.  This year’s course was downtown and did not have the technical opening.  The corners were wide open and the road surface, despite many manhole covers, quite good for city streets.  The reigning champ, Kim Pettit had a teammate (Debbie) in the 45-49 field.  I expected them to jump from the start and try to get away together. My strategy was to jump with them.

 

The officials called up the top five as ranked by USA Cycling for the crit.  I lined up next to Kim and hoped the hand over my heart during the National Anthem would calm my jitters.  The whistle blew and….nothing.  No attack.  Deep breath.

 

After a couple of laps, Debbie attacked.  I sat on Kim’s wheel.  Someone gave chase and Kim joined. I followed.  I noticed that Janelle H. (Colavita – who now lives in Tucson) was also watching Kim.  There were a couple of attacks that others chased down.  Everyone was nervous, I think.  As we pulled through the start/finish on a lap, Kim attacked and was joined by her teammate and one other.  They had a gap.  I heard Chuck yelling to go go go.  I knew this could be it. I was up out of the saddle, eyes focused on catching them.  Someone was on my wheel (I assume Janelle) and we bridged across and the field was strung out.  Once they were caught, it shut down and the field was together.  This pattern would continue – quick attack, chased down.  I stayed in the pack and let others chase as much as I could.  If the race comes down to a sprint, I would need every ounce of energy I had.

 

At 7 to go and no more free laps, someone crashed just behind me.  Luckily, no one was seriously hurt other than some broken ribs.

 

Soon it was the bell lap.  Christine moved to the front of the pack and Kim sat on her wheel.  Last year after the race, Kim told me she knew she had to go early since she is not a sprinter.  I expected her to do the same this year and waited on her wheel.  As we took the second to last corner, they were on the far right side of the road and I was worried about getting boxed in.  Laura was sitting on Ainhoa’s (ABRT) wheel.  As I moved off Kim’s wheel, Ainhoa jumped, followed by Laura.  Everyone accelerated, out of the saddle and into the last turn.  I heard gears shifting and shouting.  I realized that most of my field was behind me.  I thought of the last few weeks sprinting at Ft. Hunt with Chuck – on his wheel and trying to go around him at speed.  I thought of last year when I was nipped at the line out of 4th.  I realized I was sprinting for a national championship (oh the irony in that…me sprinting).

 

Evo Results:

50-54:

Dana:  3rd (bronze medal)

Christine:  9th

45-49:

Laura:  5th (podium)

 

Evo BAR Results:

50-54:

Dana:  3rd

Christine:  10th

45-49:

Laura:  8th

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Race Report: US Masters’ Nationals by Dana Stryk

Masters Nats

US Masters’ Nationals
Winston-Salem, NC
May 25 – 28, 2016

 

Master Women's Crit Championship

With Masters’ Nats scheduled during a month when I am not teaching, I set my sights on three races, targeting the time trial (TT). Why the TT? I like to be in control. Race strategy and tactics are not my strongest suit, so the TT made sense to me. If I adopted and adhered to an appropriate training plan and executed a race strategy based on my power data, I will have given 100%. If someone beats me, I can be disappointed but without regret.

 

Chuck developed my training schedule, stressing progressively longer intervals at my “I hate this” zone. Wendy joined me on Tuesday evenings to spin inside and suffer with a computrainer workout modeled after the TT course. Chuck added ETap to improve ease of shifting on my TT bike. I avoided illness and cursed allergies. I gave up wine and Nutella to minimize empty calories. I went back to my old love – weightlifting during the winter months.

 

Finally, departure day arrived. We loaded up the RV with 6 Scott bikes and a lot of Zipp wheels. NC bound. We stayed in High Point, about 30 minutes from the road and crit courses and an hour from the TT. We were joined by my teammate Christine and the rest of the Evo Men’s Masters’ team. Nine people, two dogs and a whole lot of carbon.

 

Road Race (RR):
3 laps, 88.5 km
Women’s 50-54, 25 preregistered.

 

The day before the RR, Chuck, the Fuenti and I checked out the loop. Compared to MABRA courses, it was rather flat and reminded us of the old Murad RR in the Poolesville area. We would have the full road which was great for us and essential for the men’s fields which had more than 100.

 

We arrived at the course early and set up our camp. I started my pre-race “Let’s get far too nervous” routine. Fill bottles, pin numbers, sit and stare into space trying to calm butterflies. Remembering to breathe.

 

USAC combined our field with the 55-59 age group (still scored separately), bringing the total field size to almost 40. Four women represented MABRA, Janelle and Chris (Colavita) joined Christine and me. Janelle and I lined up side-by-side on the start line. Vic, Dave and Chuck were taking pics as we listened to the chief official give instructions. Given the palpitations of my heart, I could not really hear what was said. I just waited for the whistle and the start of my first National Championship race.

 

Without any serious climbs, the course would not significantly narrow the pack. As we counted down the miles, some attacks did occur but were easily shut down. During the climb on the steepest hill on lap 2, I was riding toward the back of the pack on the right side edge when someone decided to pass on the non-existent pavement to my right. How we stayed upright, I am not sure but….I found myself sprinting to reattach. The field was not pedaling too fast and I quickly moved to the left side of the group, swearing off the edges of the road for the rest of the race.

 

Midway through the second lap, I was pretty sure the race would come down to a sprint finish and given the bike handling I had seen, thought there might be a crash. As we passed the feed zone with about 3 miles to go, I was in the back of the pack. I needed to move up and followed Janelle’s wheel to the center, about second row. Riding by some was a bit chaotic and I wanted to stay on Janelle’s smooth wheel. She ended up trapped behind some riders who seemed to sit up as others started to sprint. Luckily, I moved to the dreaded right side as the finish came into view. I stood to sprint and was surprised to feel my quads spasm. I sat down for a second and stood again. Spasm. I crossed in the line in 8th place, somewhat happy. My first race in a national championship was over.

 

Lessons Learned: My failure in this race was primary hydration. It was warm, not hot and the cramping at the end of the race was avoidable. I did not sufficiently hydrate before the race. Although I was targeting the TT, I should have kept my head better in the game. The podium was possible for me and I wasted an opportunity.

 

Criterium
45 minutes
Women’s 50-54, 25 preregistered.

 

I wanted to skip the crit. I wanted my legs to be well-rested for the TT the next day. If Christine had not been in the race, I would have bailed. The course was short with 5 technical turns immediately after the start finish, then more open until the funnel to the finish. After the far from stellar bike handling skills demonstrated in the road race, I planned to jump at the whistle to get through those turns at the front of the group.

 

We line up. More heart palpitations. The whistle blows and the women to my right, Kimberly Pettit (2nd in the RR), jumps and I chase her wheel. I look back and no one in behind me through the turns. She yells at me to pull through and we start working together….we have a break. Her cornering was far more aggressive than my inner-chicken liked but I was determined to stay on her wheel. I thought my heart would explode. At that moment I thought about my legs and the TT the next day. The TT went out the window. I was in a break in the national championships. I followed her lines through the technical turns and prayed I stayed rubber side down.

 

Four riders bridged up to us. My heart and lungs were very thankful to have some help. We had about 14 seconds on the chasing group. As we approached the funnel into the start/finish line, I could see the chasing group enter the open section of the course. Each lap, my sighting was about the same place and our time gap stayed consistent.

 

As we rotated on the front, I realized that two of the women were pulling off immediately and no amount of yelling or cajoling would get them to work. Kimberly was super strong. She told me to watch her for a signal to attack, for she feared we would get caught. Our lead over the chasers grew to 30 seconds. We were safe.

 

With three to go, I heard Vic shout, “Think about the finish”. I knew I needed to jump early and planned to go as the course opens up and is more exposed to the wind. Bell lap. Kimberly jumped far earlier than anyone expected and we gave chase. I had one of the women who failed to do any work on my wheel and could not shake her. She nipped me at the line to put me in 5th place and on the podium. Christine’s work in the chasing group helped ensure an EVO podium! I was exhausted but very happy.

 

Lessons Learned: Think about more than the last lap and be more aware of the person who I think is the greatest threat. After chatting with Kimberly after the race, she told me she thought I was the one to beat and wanted to go early to get away from me. I should have been more aware of her position during that last lap.

 

Time Trial

33 km
Women’s 50-54, 19 preregistered.

 

After the crit, I was pooped. I spent the evening using my recovery legs, reading and hydrating. I would not make the same mistake as in the RR. As I warmed up for the TT, my power meter suggested great feats of glory were possible, with power readings in the 600+ range at an RPE of 4. Hmmm.

 

Power meter recalibrated and battery changed, Chuck guided me to the start of the TT. I was 5th from the end to start. Despite the hard effort during the crit, my legs felt ok. The course is rolling – very little flat and the hills not super long. Mimi was a welcome face in the starting house as she counted me down to what I hoped would be another Evo podium.

 

5-4-3-2-1 and I was off. Although I still had some spiky power readings, I settled into my race strategy to climb the hills as quickly as I could (my comparative advantage) and maintain as much power as I could during the downhills (my comparative disadvantage). After the turnaround, the woman 30 seconds behind me passed me. I caught her on the next hill. She passed my on the downhill, both of us trying to avoid any chance of illegal drafting. The woman who started last (2 minutes behind me) passed me and I noticed the same pattern. I would gain time on the uphill and lose time on the downhill.

 

I passed about 4 riders but never caught my 30 second person. I ended up 11th, about three minutes behind the women who won. When we looked at my power file, I hit my numbers. Perhaps I could have been a little faster. A minute max. Three minutes….no way. I fell short of my placement goal – on the podium, hopefully wearing gold.

 

Kudos:
To Chuck – for perfecting the fine art of being both the girlfriend and the boyfriend, for believing in my cycling and being by my side every km of this journey.
To Christine – for having my back during races and organizing Evo team headquarters, food and shelter.
To Cam, Dan, Vic and Dave – for cheering for our crit
To Wendy – for the Tuesday night pain and dinner sessions

When Math is Simple but not Easy

According to the Center for Disease Control and Prevention, in 2013, more than 60% of adults aged 18 and older in the United States were either obese or overweight. That same year, Americans spent more than $60 billion annually trying to lose weight.[1] Strange diet and exercise ads litter the internet and television, promising a “magic bullet”, allowing one to lose weight with only three easy payments of $29.95 plus shipping and handling.

At the end of the day, weight loss is a simple math problem. If the following inequality holds, one will lose weight:

Calories In < Calories Out

 

My selection of the adjective simple is deliberate. I overheard someone at training camp snidely commenting on a statement from one of the nutrition lectures (from Lori Nedescu). “She said it was easy. It is not.” This snarl comes from the misuse of adjectives – simple and easy are not the same. The nutritionist referred to the math equation and the athlete to the difficulty adhering

Chuck in March of 2015 to the constraints of that equation. The math is simple. Implementing the equation is not easy.

 

 

In March 2015, my husband weighed 212 pounds at training camp. As a cyclist concerned about watts per kilogram and married to another cyclist who likes to do hilly road races, he announced his intention to reach 175 pounds by September when he toes the line at U.S. Masters Nationals. He has made similar statements in the almost four years we have been together. He achieved short-lived success by implementing some draconian diet plan, but the results did not stick.

 

This time it is different. Why?

 

Math.

 

For the first time, he tuned out the “bright shiny thing” diet books or plans and focused on both sides of the equation, both of which required a great deal of lifestyle change.

 

Calories – out: With his military job and time spent on Kylecoaching and cycling team responsibilities, training was at the bottom of the list in terms of importance. In his desire to make USMES a success, his training (and mine) suffered greatly. However, he knew this needed to change. In my opinion, his calorie-out success comes from three items:

 

1. Accountability: He hired Damian Ruse (SPC Coaching) as his coach and uploaded his files daily.

 

2. Priority: When we would arrive home after work, we immediately hopped on the bike before he would check email or social media.

 

3. Variety: He hates the gym. I stated my desire to return to my weight-lifting regime and he said he would go with me. I have heard that before. This time he actually goes…complaining….but he is there with me.

 

Calories – in: The food side of the house is always the hardest. Chuck’s calorie-in achievements come from these three concepts or actions:

 

1. Signaling: A friend of mine who is a personal trainer who I greatly respect once commented to me that his clients who struggled to lose weight needed to learn to be hungry. We eat for some many reasons beyond fueling our bodies for the rigors of life. Chuck learned to be hungry…that his desire for food X wasn’t because his body needed it but because he wanted it. He learned to say no.

 

2. Data: Using a diet tracking app on his phone (myfitnesspal), he logged everything that he ate before he ate it. Since this app is on-line, his food entries are there for all to see.

 

3. Exclusion: Chuck, as many do, loves comfort foods and food variety and we all have many food buttons from our experiences in childhood and beyond. In order to maintain race weight and health, certain restaurants are no longer frequented by our household. Period. No more 5 Guys, la Madeleine, and other places I would rather not admit I have frequented.

Chuck and friend Jeffrey on May 31st 2015

 

Above all, Chuck benefited from the advice of a subject matter expert on nutrition, Dr. James Weinstein. In the beginning, Chuck went a little crazy with the calorie counting. (and little is used loosely – completely might be better). Jim guided him from “Eating under 1000 calories/day is my goal” strategy to one which is sustainable for both the athlete and those who love him.

 

As of the beginning of June, Chuck weighs 186 pounds and his race results show great improvement AND the completion of the mother of all hilly road races….Tour of Tucker County. He is healthier and no longer eats my chocolate. We no longer disagree about riding after work or on the weekend when not racing. Now if I can only convince him that getting a dog somehow is part of this process…..#lovehomerweinstein.

 

[1]Geoff Williams, “The Heavy Price of Losing Weight”, http://money.usnews.com/money/personal-finance/articles/2013/01/02/the-heavy-price-of-losing-weight.

 

Race Report: French Fries and the Rolling Thunder….. – Dana Stryk

Race Report

The French Fry Crit (McDonald’s TriState Criterium), Saturday, May 29th, Huntington, WV:
Jenette William and Dana
after the race
Chuck’s hometown puts on a race every year.  The promoter, Jeff’s Bike Shop, does an excellent job and must have some incredible sponsors.  The course is a flat, 4 left turn rectangle with open corners and decent pavement. I have raced the past two year, finishing 5th and 8th.  In the past, I have tried to create break since the field has one woman in particular who is an amazing sprinter (by the name of Jenette Williams – who races in our area from time to time).  This year, with still-rebuilding-from-traveling-to-Mongolia status, my goal was to sit on her wheel, let her pull me to the line and then pray for divine intervention.  Jenette has a nice steady wheel ath – short of my goal of a podium but happy with most of my race.  I made enough to cover race fees and pay for dinner.  I only wish they would offer French Fry premes…..

nd I stuck to her like glue until she drifted to the back of the pack where, given the crashes in previous years, I did not want to be.  There were attacks but nothing stuck.  With 2 to go, I made mental notes as to where I needed to be on the final two turns.  Into the second to the last turn, I lost Jenette’s wheel but had a clear shot to the line.  I ended up 6

Millers School Age-Graded RR:
The 35+ and 45+ Masters women raced together.  As our start time neared, the skies darkened and thunder could be heard.  Chuck, my soigneur (what else should the newly retired do??), changed
VACA State Podium

wheels for me.  Two years ago, Mother Nature’s wrath was sent upon us and I promised that I would not race anything other than aluminum wheels when I could hear thunder.  Of course, switching from 303s to 101s ensured we were dry, a sacrifice about which I am joking but will take credit for the dry conditions.  Our race was shortened to 2 laps – I believe all the races in the afternoon were shortened. Normally, the shortened length would anger me since I fare better when the course is harder. However…this year I was happy that it was shorter.

I think the group stayed together until the first time past the finish line and slowly our numbers dwindled.  This year our races have become interesting in terms of who is willing to work and who sits in.  I was worried about having enough fitness to do work at the front, so I was among those hiding.  Sue and Amanda (ABRT) attacked the field multiple times as did Jenette (from the aforementioned French Fry crit), but everything was chased down.  By the time we hit the final stretch, we were a total of about 12 – with 4 (including me) in the 45+ category.  I knew where the attack would happen and it did – at that point, I honestly could not suffer anymore and watched the group ride away from me.  Janelle (Colavita), who won the 45+ race, was behind me at the time and I just let her go.  I can give a litany of excuses….off the bike due to family obligations last week, lots of stress from travel and other things….but at the moment when I needed to gut it out just a couple more meters, I could not.  Janelle and Patti (both Colavita) had a great race and congrats to them for the top two steps on the podium.  I ended up 4th for MABRA and 2nd for the VACA 45-49 age group.
Next up:
We will head down south for the Chesapeake Criterium (which is the VA State Championship) and the PLT TT, to get a little TT practice before ToWC.
Dana

Racing and working, the endless struggle – Dana Stryk

I am a PhD economist with the State Department and provide both education and training to our diplomats.  Recently we started offering classes abroad at post – which is an amazing opportunity for me as an economist but huge challenge as a cyclist with respect to training and maintaining acquired fitness as I traverse time zones and cultures.
Jeff Cup:After some great training in Tucson in March, I went to Dubai and Doha to teach Data Analysis and the Economics of Energy.  Traveling with my bike was not possible so I was thankful for the 24 hour gym and jet lag which meant I was awake when the rest of the UAE and Qatar was asleep.  The experiences were amazing but….after 14 hours on a Qatar Airways flight from Doha without a single open seat, I arrived in DC less than 12 hours before Jeff Cup.  More importantly….I left about 90 degrees to return to winter.  My inner lizard (named Lizzie) really does not like cold, let alone the taunting of warm weather for about 2 weeks and then cold.  Lizzie and I decided Jeff Cup was a bad idea, got on the trainer and discovered we left legs and lungs in Doha.
Sea Otter:
Liz and I targeted Sea Otter as the first race.  The weather should be good and I would have enough time to gain back some fitness.  The first race was a crit on the Mazda Laguna Seca speedway.  About 40 women were in the field and the course– two almost 360 degree turns that brought the field to a track stand.  The field stayed together.  I popped off after getting pushed into the railing on one of the turns and I just decided it was a nice day to TT instead.  My fitness was ok but I was still not pleased.  The rest of the week was spent pedaling along 17 Mile Drive, ignoring the call to tee off at Pebble.
Tour of Page County:
Road Race:  Unlike last year, where people attacked throughout the race, the pace for three of the four laps was recipe-exchange inducing.  The field had some very strong women, but only a few seemed interested in racing more than for the final sprint.  I tried a couple of times to get away as did Sue (ABRT), Michele S. (Bike Stop), Laura (James River Velo) and a few others but…it was not a race until the final kilometer.  I finished 6th.
Time Trial:  I like the TT course and had a good warmup.  The roads were wet and I found myself nervous about the handling of my bike on the wet pavement.  I thought I was ok until my 30 sec. person behind me passed me.  We usually TT around the same pace, so I decided to use her for a rabbit.  Once the road sloped down I realized I was a big chicken and backed off.  Arrggh.  8th in the TT (my rabbit was 3rd…shoulda, woulda, coulda I guess)
Crit:  Sue from ABRT mentioned her plan to jump at the start of the race, which was my plan so…she jumped, I followed and after a couple of laps we had about 8, then 6 and then 5.  The rest of the field was broken up – with an eventual chase group forming of about 8.  I popped off the pack and chased back as a preme lap bell rang…I should have moved to the very front but…did not.  I popped off again, this time for good, with about 6 or 7 to go.  Now I needed to stay away from the chasing group.  On the penultimate lap, I heard Chuck yell…they are catching you…you have to bury yourself.  Even Mimi (the chief official) cheered for me at some point when I was in no-man’s land.  As I made the turn to take the hill for the last time, I heard Chuck yelling…stand…you have to stand. Obviously, he could see more than I could, so I sprinted up the hill, safely in 5th.  Afterwards, I saw the 2000 pictures that Sophie’s mom (RC Velo…junior) took (kid you not 2000) which allowed me to see the race unfold.  Good thing I stood and sprinted….
While I was mad at popping, I was happy that my fitness seemed better.
Argyle Time Trial:  I selected the 23 mile option.  Due to the lack of a road marshal on a turn, most of the juniors and women did a TT of variable length.  Wendy (Colavita and a name you all know) also did about 23.  Sue (ABRT) choose the 30 mile option.  Since I was the only W1/2, it did not matter. 

Time to fly to Mongolia.  Dulles to Bejing to 6 hours in the airport to Ulaanbaatar – 23 hours of traveling and I was in the capital city of Mongolia.  More indoor cycling.  Ulaanbaatar to Seoul to Tokyo.  At the Imperial Gardens, I saw hundreds of cyclists but it seemed in poor form to knock someone off their bike so I could ride.  More indoor spinning.  Lots of good food and great experiences but fitness dwindling every day.  Tokyo to Dulles to start the hardest recovery from traveling I have ever had.  The 13 hour time difference and 14 hours in coach…I wanted to cry when I thought about my race season.

So – what better way to reengage than…wait for it…the Tour of Tucker County?  I blame jet lag for my decision.  Not sure what possessed Chuck to suggest it. Hell must have frozen….
Tour of Tucker County:  You know it will be bad when the race director asks who is new and who has any idea of what is in store for them…56 miles with 2 climbs of note….and of course, ending on a nice ascent.  I told myself the last climb was only a Cat1…my legs have collected HC summits in the Alps and Pyrenees.  I can do this.  I did it but it was not pretty.  We rolled with the Masters men and I became reacquainted with God through a prayer during some of slight descents at the start of the race.  I soon realized that trying to maintain that pace would call into doubt my ability to finish so I slowed down and found another in my race with whom to work.  To be polite about this…she was unhappy that she would be off the podium and got into the car at the feed-zone.  Time for a 20 mile TT without water.  Once I finished, I must have been delirious for I apparently posted on FB that Mike Stearns looks good on a bike…most important lesson learned….secure cell phone in the RV before leaving for the start line….
Tour of Somerville:  I wish my legs had three races in them but after Tucker, I was so tired that I decided to focus on Somerville.  I want to race Masters Nats in September and thought this would be the better of the two races (Ft. Ritchie being the other).  I really liked Somerville last year, despite crashing in the final corner on the final lap and wanted to attempt to remain upright this year.  My goal for the race was to overcome my inner chicken and position myself in the middle of the group if not toward the front.  The first few laps I was again in the back…sprinting to maintain contact after the second turn.  The race had the same feel as last year – after the start/finish sprint out of turn 2 then slower for the rest of the lap.  Sue (ABRT) was also in the race and I tried to stay on her wheel.  At one point, Laura Van Gilder attacked and found myself in a small group chasing.  The bubble thought on that pic, “OMG.  I am chasing LVG.”  Midway through the race, Sue jumped when I was on her wheel.  After a momentary pause, I gave chase and the woman behind me shouted that we had a break.  I figured I would die before I would give up getting Sue’s wheel.  I caught it, we had a little break for half a lap and we were back together.  Racing while starstruck is hard to do!  A women went off the front with about 10 to go – she was literally caught with 5 meters to go.  I managed to finish with the pack.
Next up:  The French Fry Crit (McDonald’s Criterium) in Huntington, WV (Chuck’s hometown) Sat and Millers School on Sunday.  Hope the legs are there from Tokyo!  Chuck is racing the 3/4 35+ at Miller’s School – so we will be there all the day.  Look for the RV if you need a place to hang out.
Dana

Training with Moxy

Dana M. Stryk

A few weeks ago we added a new gadget to the list of data gathering devices, a Moxy Monitor (MM), which measures muscle oxygen saturation levels. This device is about the size of 1.5 packets of artificial sweetener and 0.82 inch thick. You place the MM on the center of the vastus lateralis, halfway between the greater trochanter and medial condyle. As the amount of oxygen in the hemoglobin changes, the color of the hemoglobin also changes. Using near-infrared light, the MM reads the color of the hemoglobin, translating this data into a percentage of muscle oxygenation, SmO2. I will leave anything more than this very basic explanation to the scientists, so visit the website to learn more.

We use PerfPro software to run all of our computrainer videos and the MM data can be transmitted real-time to this program and displayed with the other data such as Power Zones, Watts, heart rate (if I used a monitor) and so on. One of the statistics generated is Percentage of SmO2. Please keep in mind that I am an dismal scientist (i.e. economist) and the last time I had a biology class was in high school, so my impressions of the usefulness and any meaning of these numbers is based on cardiac knowledge rather than scientific theory (cardiac knowledge = what I know deep in my heart is true but have no proof).

My research questions:

  1. What type of warm-up would be most beneficial? I think I need a long warm-up before my legs are ready for hard efforts. The warm-up prior to racing is something that I tend to minimize for several reasons. Could these numbers prove my inner “you really should warm up on the trainer and stop socializing” voice correct? 
  2. Do I notice a correlation between watts and %SmO2? 
  3. Will the data from MM suggest that I should have skipped graduate school and pursued a professional cycling career (ignoring the fact that I did not ride a bike at that time in my life)? 

Field Research:

Nasty weather and my outside temperature restrictions (below 40F?? on the computrainer!) relegated me to an indoor trainer. Luckily, we have a computrainer spin studio in the garage, with almost every Sufferfest video and many ErgVideos in our library. From tempo to VO2 max efforts, a video exists to create pain, suffering and a great deal of sweat. All data comes from these indoor rides, which lasted between 45 and 180 minutes.

The MM sits on the centerpoint of one of the quad muscles, with the elasticity of your bib shorts holding it in place since the neoprene strap which comes with the MM is too annoying to wear when cycling. With the shorter length of many women’s bib shorts, it is difficult to keep the MM in place. It moves toward the hip and toward the side of the leg when pedaling. Due to my preference for having skin, I ignored a suggestion from my training partners to use duct tape to secure it in place.

MM impressions:

  1. My legs need much longer than I normally give them to warm-up. During the week, my legs usually feel tired or dead when I first get on the bike. My %SmO2 for these workouts began in the 40-50% range, decline a bit and then started to increase after about 10 minutes. My rating of perceived exertion also fell, despite an increase in my actual exertion (measure by watts).  Warming up for me is more important than I realized.  I reflect back on a couple of races last summer when it was too hot to warm-up, so I did not and wondered why I really wanted to die for the first twenty minutes when others who also did a minimal warm-up seemed fine.  The MM data shows the importance of increasing hemoglobin and oxygenation prior to the start of my races. 
  2. Inverse relationship between watts and % SmO2 once warmed-up, as expected. Higher values of %SmO2 indicate more recovery and I noticed these numbers increasing during recovery between intervals. 
  3. The value returned for %SmO2 strongly depends on the placement of the MM on the vastus lateralis. For example, I placed the MM on the center point (between the head of the femur and the medial condyle) of this muscle, on the estimated midway point. It moves. When it moves, the %SmO2 number changes. From my experience, it appears that moving the MM toward the hip increases the %SmO2 value and moving it toward the abductor decreases the value. The movement needed to generate these changes is small, about 3-4 mm. 
  4. If higher %SmO2 values correlate to greater recovery, my legs recover quickly between intervals. This correlation indicates that my excuses of….”my legs were fried and I just needed to sit in” holds for a brief period of time but….indicates the needed ability to just “embrace the suck” so to speak. 

Overall assessment:

The jury is still out. The MM data will help craft an efficient warm-up for the different races we do. The more data we gather, the better, with the hope of understanding the relationship between these values and data from the power meter.

Oh, sadly, my choice of graduate school over attempted employment within the pro peloton was probably the correct one.